Top latest Five h4831 vs h4831sc Urban news
Top latest Five h4831 vs h4831sc Urban news
Blog Article
Your session is going to timeout as a result of inactivity. Simply click Okay to extend your time for a further 0 minutes.
Needless to say, the Hodgdon tech would not endorse my mixing of different lot quantities, but I feel I understand why. It is a litigation-pushed entire world, and many idiot would surely deduce that he could blend H380 and H110 and come up with his personal custom blend of powder. What a world.
What's the real difference? Compression. With no Severe/major compression connected with the extended grain 7828, the force curve was altered and also the load fell apart.
Sweet!! I will decide some up and provides it a test. Thanks men, I enjoy it! I'll let you determine what I determine. I do have a couple of fifty percent pound of 4350 I can try that first and find out what transpires.
Yup or it is not going to function effectively. And For the reason that OP contains a load using Varget I'd try out to seek out another person to trade with. May well come up with a get acquire predicament.
Considering the fact that there isn't going to seem like any "Formal" Load Data in existence for this Load, can some of you offer a starting point with this mixture and factors to consider when working this Load up?
Anybody loading 7mm Rem Mag with H4831sc? How are the outcomes, any data you are able to share? Should also point out I've some ELD-X one hundred seventy five's I want to check out, Should you have data on that at the same time.
excaliber claimed: I've uncovered the exact reverse to get accurate h4831sc in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with a hundred and eighty g Accubonds. RL22 was a considerably faster and Similarly correct powder in my three hundred Get Mag.
dioni.a.312 said: In my practical experience the only true change is that the shortcut meters greater through reloading machines. As soon as It can be loaded theres no purposeful big difference. I have read which the shortcut might have a small little bit a lot quicker burn charge but It appears insignificant. Click on to extend...
It really is amusing how through the years loading innumerable diverse cartridges in a variety of rifles which h4831sc load data i haven't acquired appropriate finish success with H-4831 or even the small-Reduce Model.
I needed a tiny bit additional myself so I went forward and grabbed the 8lb jug to be included h4831 vs h4831sc for some time (and have loads of precisely the same great deal of powder).
I take advantage of 52 grs H4831sc that has a 117gr Hornady BTSP. It really is accurate, moderate mannered, and knocks whitetails down DRT. If it had been me, I would start out at 52 gr and do the job up.
I commonly usually have the sc Edition. Using a powder measure it hangs up less resulting from shorter kernels and I believe allows far more constant metering so a lot less time you take trickling in the last bit of demand to create body weight. So basically the SC saves you situations
The reality that the H4831 is in fact a slower burning powder is specifically why you might be seeing greater velocities acquired with that powder, rather than That which you've found with the IMR things.